Othello (1951)
Director: Orson Welles
Starring: Orson Welles, Micheál Mac Liammóir, Suzanna Cloutier
Honors:
Grand Prix - Cannes Film Festival
Orson Welles’ passion for creating motion picture art
superseded every limitation presented to him, as well as the abandonment of Hollywood’s
system for the filmmaker that helped pave one of its finest films. Here, in Othello,
this passion is on full display as he writes, directs, produces, and stars in
his adaptation of the William Shakespeare tragedy. With a production backstory it
manifests his desire creating, performing, and admiring the performing arts and
movie making. Produced through a series of road blocks, it was a feature several
years in the making that is hastily created, beautifully constructed while
being a somewhat mangled, and incapsulates the struggles the a filmmaker through
the remainder of his career.
Othello is a Shakespearian drama about vengeance
through creating distrust within the marriage of an authority figure as a form
of manipulation. A Moorish general in the Venetian army, Othello (Welles)
becomes the center of ire of his jealous, yet trusted ensign Iago (Micheál Mac
Liammóir). Using Othello’s recent marriage to the noble lady Desdemona (Suzanna
Cloutier), Iago plants distrust in the general’s that she has been unfaithful
with a loyal captain Cassio (Michael Laurence), sending Othello down a destructive
path. Uncovering the truth that Desdemona what faithful all along comes too
late for Othello as he had killed his wife, left only with enough will to punish
his secret enemy Iago before, in grief, claiming his own life.
Filmed in numerous beautiful locations throughout Europe, Orson
Welles employs the stunning scenery and elaborate architecture to deliver an
authentic feeling Shakespearian story to the movie screen. The script uses much
of the original Shakespearian dialogue, but trims off a great many scenes to
pare down the five act play into a final picture that runs approximately 90
minutes, leaving many portions of the picture feeling rushed, often with hurried
editing. As the titular character, Welles’ performance commands the screen in
his common manner, a presentation troubled only through the prism of acting in
blackface. One could defend that in doing so this production keeps in a manner beholden
to how the part would have been portrayed in the years when the play was
originally performed. However, this can be set aside as the Moorish nature of
the character plays little role in fullness of the story and picture. In a way
the feature appears a mess, but in another manner it is splendid in keeping its
roots and presenting a love letter to the author and his work.
Intended in a way to be a follow up to Welles’ previous
Shakespearian adaptation of MacBeth (1948), the feature of Othello
became an erratic production that needed over three years to finish, filled
with a number of stops and stalls willed into being with the efforts of the
famed filmmaker to be completed. With MacBeth being considered a troublesome
disaster between Welles and studio producers, the filmmaker made his way to
Europe to in pursuit of new projects, which included for a period being the
originally writer for Alexander Korda’s Cyrano de Bergerac (1950) before
being dismissed.
Othello became a viable project for Welles under
Italy’s Scalera Films, penning the script while leading the project as producer,
and setting himself as both director and star on a proruction to be shot in various
Mediterranean locals. In 1949, while awaiting the delivery of the costumes with
his cast and crew in Morocco, Welles was brought the unfortunate news of
Scalera going bankrupt, immediately ceasing Othello. Thus began Welles’ story
of determination to get his vision created.
Funneling his own money into the project Orson would get the
movie started before running out of money himself. To help fund the picture
Welles would take time to find personal acting work throughout Europe, both on
screen and in radio, periodically returning to get more of Othello in
the can. The jerky nature of production was in its own way a trouble as cast
and crew would be altered to suit the needs of the movie until Welles was able
to finish principal photography in early 1951. Through all the difficulties, casting
and quality suffered, but it did not quell the passion Welles has for his
vision and creativity, scrounging enough resources and effort to complete the
picture despite having no distributor signed on.
For Orson Welles, Othello was a shrewd effort of production
manipulation as the filmmaker to find the means to deliver what was needed from
his cast and crew. Micheál Mac Liammóir was
an older choice for the role of Iago, a decision justified by Welles to capture
a more impotent and jealous character as an antagonist. The performance of Canadian
actress Suzanne Cloutier was the result of recasting because of the jerky
nature of production as she filled in as Desdemona and became an ally of Welles
in many of his future, unfinished works. Various other English performers would
appear in keys roles, including Robert Coote and Fay Compton as Roderigo and
Emilia.
Due to extensive location shooting near the sea or in rooms
that created great echoes, most all of the audio from principal photography was
in need of voice dubbing which too was a hasty process, evident in the poor lip
synchronization. It would take work to make the dubbing passable, but in the
meantime Othello would see a premiere viewing in a Rome screening in
November of 1951. For this initial viewing all audio was dubbed in Italian, sidestepping
a need proper lip-syncing as this first version was used to drum interest in
film. Meanwhile Welles continued to finish the final English language picture which
competed as an entrant at the 1952 Cannes Film Festival in May 1952. Audio
would be cleaned up slightly and topped with a unique soundtrack by Italian
composer Angelo Francesco Lavagnino in time for the festival screening, which
met mixed critical reviews, with most negativity centering on the poor audio
quality.
Despite the critiques Othello was praised for its
visuals, and like many well-made Shakespeare motion pictures, it was given
rather high regard for its classical acting nature. Welles and his feature came
away from Cannes sharing the festival’s top prize that year and the attention
it needed to be distributed widely in Europe and later on in America following
more work to clean up the sloppy audio.
For Welles what we observe here in his producing of Othello
parallels much of what he had to do for the rest of his career in motion
pictures. Othello was just one example of the work it took for him to
simply create by continually needing to find funding to get just enough to keep
shooting his next project.
For the most part, Othello was ignored by Americans
with mainly critics and film students taking the time to really view and study
to the feature. Welles’s daughter, Beatrice Welles-Smith, in the early 1990s supervised
a restoration of her father’s film, looking to improve visual and audio quality
well after Welles’ death. In an age when black and white films were being
colorized for home video markets, intial naïve critics praised the restoration.
However, like colorization of older movies, the restoration would be met with
great reproach. Apart from the cleaned visuals and re-synching of the dialogue,
scenes were altered, additionally sound effects added, and the entire
soundtrack was rerecorded. The film lacked the nuances of the original Welles
version in the shortsighted move. The restoration would meet critical attack,
but it did open a door to anew preserved copy of the original version of the
feature.
Othello is not so much a good film as it is a study of Orson Welles and his career in his post-Hollywood period. His passion is on screen for all to observe, even if the work is not always of peak quality. For anyone who loves film, Shakespeare, and the meeting of the two, this feature is a fine film to digest for it is filled with more than what meets the eye.
Comments
Post a Comment