Bicycle Thieves (1948)



Director: Vittoria De Sica

Honors:

Considered by many to be one of the finest motion pictures in cinematic history, Bicycle Thieves is a testament to the power of motion pictures within a state of simplicity. With a humble running time on 93 minutes and a cast of amateurs this film captures a deep seeded sense of emotion, manifests the power of the cinematic medium, and transcends the era within it was created. Today it is a staple of the any student of film as art, continuing to inspire countless filmmakers for generations. Its story and presentation captured the hearts of cinematic world, earning numerous international honors, and helped to change the most influential institution in Hollywood, the Academy Awards, by helping to a new category for international productions.

Bicycle Thieves is an Italian neorealist drama about a poor laborer searching for his stolen bicycle, the item that without could cost him his employment. Antonio Ricci (Lamberto Maggiorani) a poor citizen of post-World War II Rome is given promise of work as an advertising bill poster on the condition that he has a bicycle to do the job. His wife Maria (Lianella Carell) pawns prized family items to acquire the bicycle since it was an opportunity of decent money for their family, but on his first on the job Antonio has the bicycle stolen from him. Knowing it would cost him and his family a great deal, on top of the sacrifices already made, Antonio sets out in search of the stole bicycle with his young son Bruno (Enzo Staiola). After a long, arduous day of combing the streets for the bike and even confronting the thief, Antonio is left without the bike or hope. After sending Bruno away Antonio, a true and honest husband and father, makes an uncharacteristically desperate attempt to steal an unattended bike, but is immediately stopped by the owner and a crowd of scolding citizens. Heartbreakingly, the whole incident is witnessed by a shocked Bruno, a sight that the owner of the bicycle witnesses as punishment enough for Antonio, deciding to not prosecute. An ashamed Antonio begins to walk home as his traumatized Bruno takes his father’s hand as the film closes.

For a story simply about a man searching for his bicycle, this movie hits an emotional core that goes well beyond its basic description. This neorealistic capturing life of a poor neighborhood of Rome in an economic down time, this film paints a beautifully expressive picture in black and white a story of a man wanting to lovingly take care of his family to the point performing a shameful act in a moment of desperation. The entire picture culminates in a final scene that surges with sentiment as a father shatters the innocence of his son, who has followed him like a dough eyed loving dog ever looking up to his father. I a quick moment their relationship is forever change and things will never be the same. The film can be slow, but never is it dull or uninteresting. It is entirely relatable as a tale about one working to provide for his family, unexpected misfortune, and the soul searching moments that make moral people desperately dishonest. All together it is a film that is very simple to watch, very simple to relate to, and therefore easy to be caught up in.

The picture is a loose adaption of a novel by Luigi Bartolini that director Vittorio De Sica molded into his neorealist vision of post war Rome. Wanting to capture the true state of average citizens suffered greatly from a depression De Sica filmmed on the actual streets of Rome and cast amateur actors, very much in the style of Rossellini’s Rome, Open City from 1945. The result is a film that was a bit gritty, documentary-like at points, but remains very clean cinematically thanks to De Sica’s attention to detail.

For the lead character De Sica cast Lamberto Maggiorani, who at the time was a factory worker in Rome and amateur actor. With a slender build Maggiorani manofested the scant nature in which Antonio was living through. Maggiorani was so nervous about acting on set that he would shake and tense up during takes, which De Sica utilized in the anxious nature of Antonio. Altogether Maggiorani’s performance is marvelously genuine, bringing the perfect portrayal for the picture. As compensation Maggiorani was paid a meager salary that covered him purchasing new furniture for his home, as well as a family vacation. However, shortly after returning to his job at the factory Maggiorani was laid off due to budget cuts and the perception that he was making good money as a movie star. Maggiorani would never attain near the attention he received for his performance in Bicycle Thieves, finding work at laborious jobs while receiving scant bit roles in movies for a humble income, never to see prominence in acting again.

De Sica filled other roles in the picture by way of inspiration during production. The role of Antonio’s wife Maria was played by Lianella Carell, a journalist that happened to interviewing De Sica immediately before filming whom he hired to fill the role. Thanks to her performance in the role Carell found herself in the world of motion picture acting for the next decade.

The role of Bruno was perhaps the most interesting bit of casting. Early in production De Sica spotted in the crowd that commonly gathered around his crew to watch the filming a small, highly expresive boy, Enzo Staiola, the son a street flower salesman. De Sica found his peculiar look and exaggerated body language to contain characteristics that stood out, inspiring him to hire the child for the role of Anotnio’s son. Every moment Staiola is on screen our eyes are drawn to the young boy as he mostly watches and admires his father, waiting for moments to help. His performance provides moments of levitate in an otherwise serious drama, but most of all he brings the heart of the story to life as we watch his face sink watching his father become a thief himself. It is the moment shared between Antonio and Bruno in the final scene that grabs at the heartstrings of audiences as a son has been forever changed by what he witnessed his father do, but still grasps at his father’s hand in love. Staiola would for a short time peruse a career in acting, even making appearances in Hollywood films before returning to Italy, settling into a career as a math teacher.

Upon initial release in Italy Bicycle Thieves was met with criticism. Local audiences felt it portrayed Italians in a negative light, shunning the film. Luigi Bartolini, the author of the novel, shunned the changes made to his original story. However, internationally the picture received great praise, eventually opening the eyes of Italian critics. Praised for its neorealistism, its acting, and its story, the film became a rousing cinematically praised feature. American film critics embraced the artistry that greatly outshone the style of Hollywood films of the time. The British Academy Awards honored the film its greatest honor, while in America the National Board of Review and Golden Globes did the same.

At the Academy Awards the Bicycle Thieves was nominated for Best Writing (for the year 1949) while receiving an honorary award for his artistic merits as a foreign made picture. The Academy at that time did not have the Best Foreign Film category, but with the impact of Bicycle Thieves and other foreign films being honored at the Oscars during this time the Academy would begin to think about change s at their ceremonies. Beginning in 1956 the Academy would add an entirely new category regularly honoring a foreign language features at each ceremony.

Bicycle Thieves is a true treasure of the cinematic world that should be enjoyed by any enthusiast of the medium. Its story, visuals, and acting all come together in a near perfect harmony, and at the risk of sounding cliché: this film is one of the very best ever made. It is simple, but it grabs you and pulls you into a significant world of that near everyone can relate to. It is sad, sometimes funny, heartbreaking, and true to its core.

Comments

Popular Posts