Watch on the Rhine (1943)
Director: Herman Shumlin
Starring: Bette Davis, Paul Lukas
Honors:
Bette Davis headlines this anti-Nazi feature, a product of staunch
determination to share negative views towards peoples with beliefs to destroy
the freedoms of society around the world. This production based on a successful
Broadway play was the product of sharing of the resolute anti-fascist mindset
that brought Europe to the great conflict which stained the continent for over
a decade. Featuring the director and major players for the original Broadway
production, this film adaptation altered to suit motion picture audience would
not be a smooth production, but in the end received high praises for its work
at that time.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35d17/35d17174e7e867c64fe69c28bc75308a467e1a17" alt=""
The picture at times plays out very slow, meandering for
periods as the plot trickles through the two hour long feature, but for the
time period when the film was released it was looked onto with a very different
light. Watch on the Rhine is a result
of world affected by war waging that was still current. Watching this picture
years later it may not hit the audiences with the same residency as the world
and motion pictures have both changed.
“Watch on the Rhine” firstly was a rather successful
Broadway play that ran from April 1941 to February 1942, straddling the timeline
before America joined the war to the months just following Pearl Harbor. Its
anti-Nazi stance was praised and gave the production notoriety which Warner
Bros. looked to adapted into their own highly praised motion picture.
To help translate the play to the screen many components of
the successful play were hired to reprise their roles for the feature. This
included Paul Lukas in the main character role Kurt Muller, Lucile Watson as
Sara’s mother Fanny, and even director Herman Shumlin who was hired to direct in
this, his first motion picture. To add to the box office appeal Bette Davis was
cast as Kurt’s wife, which is a surprise being it is actually only a supporting
role for such a headlining star. In any case Davis wanted to take part in this
production because she felt it was an important picture to be a part of. Warner
Bros. would put Davis’ name squarely on the top billing of the picture and ordered
the fleshing out of her role within the production even though the story still
focuses on the tale of the activism of Kurt.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70948/70948bd14599491563fb6027e7af40ad0c49bdb3" alt=""
Despite the added scenes and dialogue to the role which
Bette Davis appears the picture as a whole remains more intact with the overall
story of an anti-fascist activist who is threatened and continues to fight on
in efforts for freedom. In a world where Nazis and Hitler were a very real
threat Watch on the Rhine was a
terrifying reminder that there was the possibility of Nazi sympathizers amongst
the American population and the film was meant to rally against any such individuals.
To 1943 audiences the film was dramatic and frightening,
winning over many audiences and critics. Many believed it one of the finest
movies of the year, including nominations for the Best Screenplay and Best Picture
that the Academy Awards, while being honored as the finest film of the year by
the New York Film Critics. With Bette Davis somewhat forced augment role of
Sara it remained Lucile Watson and Paul Lukas who shined through in their
performances they had refined on stage and adapted for the screen, receiving
the most praise. Watson would be nominated for her supporting role, but Lukas
came out as the paramount actor of the year as he received an Academy Award,
Golden Globe, and a New York Critics Circle Award for Best Actor.
As time goes by Watch
on the Rhine would fade into the background. The melodramatic performance
of Davis does feel a bit out of place amongst the other players in the picture
who captured the heart of the source material. Looking back, the feature
remains a reminder of what passed through the minds of frightened audiences
during a period of the global conflict, but now we can see the hints of
propaganda that spearheaded why this picture was made, and why audiences lapped
it up as a drama. It is not Bette Davis’ finest work, but reminds us of her
firm presence in Hollywood and the public at large as the film was a result of not
just a studio, but her as an influential star as well.
Comments
Post a Comment