Snake Pit, The (1948)



Director: Anatole Litvak

Honors:

It was one of the first motion pictures to attempt a realistic portrayal of mental illness and with careful research by its director and star The Snake Pit does its finest to tackle the very sensitive subject. Praised for its acting, enthralling story, and portrayal of the rarely thought of troubles of psychiatric wards, the film left an impact with audiences that facilitated rethinking about how the mentally ill are treated. The harrowing performance of leading lady Olivia de Havilland would earn the long praised actress’ performance to be considered her finest work of her career.

The Snake Pit is a drama about a young lady as she battles her sanity within the confines of a mental institution. Virginia Cunningham (Olivia de Havilland) is a young, kind, pretty lady that finds herself in overcrowded state ran mental asylum with no memory of how she got there. With the aid of a kind psychiatrist, Dr. Kik (Leo Genn) she is able to piece together her background and mental state. Depicted in a series of flashbacks we are presented how Virginia came to be committed by her loving and supportive husband, Robert (Mark Stevens), following a severe mental breakdown shortly after being wedded. Virginia experiences the flaws of the institution’s tiered systems, seeing first hand ill treatment by a vengeful nurse, landing her in the bottom rung of care known as “the snake pit,” a ward where the severe cases are dangerously locked in a large room together left to roam amongst each other. Virginia comes to mentally understand and cope with the system and with the aid of Dr. Kik connects her breakdown to unfortunately scarring events of her childhood that linked her feeling of love with deep emotional pain. With her new understanding and outlook Virginia recovers enough to be release from the hospital reunited with her husband and the world.

This picture takes on its subject matter head on with earnestness in what one can consider a very gripping movie. Vastly different from how other pictures ever looked at individuals suffering with mental illness, the film puts the viewers in the shoes and mindset of a patient suffering from confusion that found her in the mental hospital. We, the audience, ride along in her mind as she pieces together her own past while dealing with the nature of the flawed hospital staff and the danger of being surrounded by other, sometimes more troubled cases. Olivia de Havilland’s performance is deep and genuine with a portrayal that makes us believe this glamourous actress is truly suffering from mental issues, desperate to find sanity. The way the film presents mental illness is praise worthy as its Hollywood-ized version of these deeply troubling issues delivers that deep connection desired to depict the dangerous and at times disgusting setting, while allowing the troubled patients to appear appealing as characters.

Director Anatole Litvak who delivered to us earlier in the same year Sorry, Wrong Number once again captures the suspense of mental anguish. Here he brings to life the novel of Mary Jane Ward, a tale inspired by her own breakdown and time in mental hospital. Unafraid of bringing his camera in close to capture the little intricacies of emotion on his leading character’s face, Litvak once again delivers heavy emotion to his stories with subtle actions and creativity. His staging of characters, framing of shots, and use of settings allow him to create a vast array of emotional states for the character of Virginia. By bringing the camera in closer and surrounding her with a number of the supporting characters it created a feeling of suffocating claustrophobic anxiety for Virginia. He equally portrays the clearing of her mind by staging the camera further back, in wider shots, opening up the room, allowing us to feel how she is able to see things with more openly with a greater understanding.

To best understand the complicated nature of the mentally ill and their hospitals both Litva and de Havilland spent several months visiting mental institutions, mingling with staff and patients, gaining first hand experience and knowledge of the subject matter that were to portray. Olivia de Havilland threw herself profoundly into her research discovering how both a ostensibly normal person can be disturbed and how normal the most disturbed regarded cases could actually be, discovering her character in new mindset that appealed to her and the audience. This would easily be the most challenging performance of her career, and to aid in her believability she lost weight for the role, creating a gaunt, frail appearance of a woman struggling with her sanity. The performance would earn her, a recent Oscar winner, yet another nomination for Best Actress, only to fall short of the prize due to heavy completion in that year’s competition in the category. Still her portrayal of Virginia is considered one of, if not the best performance of her career.

Mark Stevens’ portrayal of Virginia’s supportive husband provided the emotional support the story needed to show a yearning for her to get better as mentally troubled patients of the era were not treated with much care. This ill treatment is manifested throughout the feature with the best example in the form of Nurse Davis, played by Helen Craig, who portrays the role as frustrated, unsympathetic, and at times vengeful; a precursor of Nurse Ratched from One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. Dr. Kik played by English actor Leo Genn is the sympathetic psychoanalyst and the only staff member who appears to truly care for Virginia to get better and be released. His performance is a bit stereotypical as the pipe-puffing intellectual, albeit it more youthful than one would expect. His character suffers from over-simplicity with a laser focused on Virginia’s wellness despite the hospital’s vast overcrowding, but this construct of Kik is obviously to aid in the plot. Despite these lacking matters of believablity his performance plays well the part of compassionate fatherly figure that pieces the puzzle that is Virginia back together.

Receiving reasonably favorable reviews, the film’s great impact was felt in how the public would look at mental hospitals after viewing The Snake Pit. The feature takes a look at a few issues that troubled such institutions including overcrowding, abusive staff members, poor program structuring, and even a look at the controversial practice of electro shock therapy. Actually the electro shock therapy is not presented as a negative in the film, but seeing it through the eyes of Virginia permits the audience to feel the anticipation of the frightening procedure as she is constrained and forced through the painful process. Similar to a dentist’s drill this is one of those few things that can make a viewer’s body cringe in pain while watching the scene play out. As a result many states saw reform within mental institutions and their practices with 20th Century-Fox going as far as using claims in publicity material.

Personally, I found The Snake Pit to be quite a attention-grabbing film to watch despite its slow moving plot. Its portrayal of the mind following a mental breakdown works well, as it presents its surrounding world as disorienting and frightening in a rather calm manner. The movie is not quite as impactful as it was in 1948, but it still stands up and a very fine film and its history speaks for itself. De Havilland probably deserved the Academy Award for her performance, but losing to Jane Wyman for her role in Johnny Belinda would not be a upset. The Snake Pit is a nice little gem of the late 1940s, a fresh surprise of Hollywood drama during a period when glamorous pictures grabbed most of the attention.

Comments

Popular Posts